Is a medical Wikipedia the next step? What seems clear is that Blogging platforms 2.0 brings people collectively in a more powerful, interactive space. This new era of internet services and devices-often referred to as public software-can be leveraged to enrich our web experience, as information is continually requested, consumed and reinterpreted. The brand-new environment includes a highly linked digital network of professionals (medical or otherwise), where knowledge exchange is not controlled or limited by private interests. For me, the promise of open access in Blogging platforms 2.0-freed of publishing barriers and multinational interests-is especially convincing. Blogging platforms 2.0 is mainly about the benefits of user-friendly and free internet software.
For example, blogs and wikis facilitate participation and conversations across a vast geographical expanse. For the present time, let’s examine the notion of a blog, which was the to begin the social software tools. Blogs are interactive websites that contain regular diary-like entries. Unlike static web pages (an attribute of Web 1.0), weblogs are more powerful and invite bloggers to create articles and take part in “one to many” discussions with readers. One of the better blogs in medication is Ves Dimov’s Clinical Cases and Images. It contains a rich assortment of “presurfed” materials for busy clinicians and features interactivity and timely discussion.
Dimov is also a supporter of medical librarian bloggers.6 Why waste time fumbling with search engines when you can consult this blog for timely improvements? As well as case discussions, Ves provides links to today’s medical headlines from Reuters and clinical images with a dynamic, free-photo writing tool called Flickr.
One of his slide presentations “Blogging platforms 2.0 in medicine” 7 is on Slideshare (itself a fantastic new 2.0-tool). RSS might be a useful way to battle information overload. RSS feeds help organize new content delivered to you instantly by the best medical blogs, evidence-based sites like the Cochrane Library, and newly published video and audio from major medical journals.
- What you can reasonably handle in your daily life
- Twitter chats get you noticed
- 11 things to do after buying a domain name
- Add additional information to the sides
- 4 Miles MT
- Secure your intellectual property rights
- USB Hacking
- Wait for at least 72 hours for the company to respond to your ticket on your email address
In fact, technology-savvy doctors are eager to use RSS feeds on mobile devices, iPods, and Blackberries and scan research on the way to ward rounds. For individuals who would rather play in the digital sandbox while on-call, try photo posting software like Flickr and medical video sharing at YouTube,10 two of the popular media sites. 2.0bn) in 2006), you can dazzle your loved ones during the vacations. Year Over the past, as a medical librarian, I’ve viewed the impact of Web 2 2.0 tools on access to information. A focus on for me was a recently available BMJ article,11 which concluded that Google-the quintessential Web 2 2.0 company-is a good diagnostic aid.
Google is a useful tool within certain parameters, if guess what happens to search for. Doctors can get lots of proof and open-gain access to materials via search tools, and they should try to learn how to use these tools responsibly. Using its many multilingual editions, Google is a benefit for developing countries with few information retrieval alternatives. This tour through Blogging platforms 2.0 eventually earnings to the basic idea of using software to create optimum knowledge building opportunities for doctors. The rise of wikis as a publishing Wikipedia-holds some unexamined pearls for the advancement of medication medium-especially. The notion of a medical wikipedia-freely accessible and continually updated by doctors-is worth further exploration.
Could wikis be used, for example, as a low cost alternative to commercial point of treatment tools like UpToDate? To a certain degree, this is going on as the search portal Trip already indexes Ganfyd now, one of a small number of medical wikis being developed. In closing, I want to say that Blogging platforms 2.0’s press for openness has resulted in the expectation of similar amounts of transparency and openness in medical publishing. The collapse of the Canadian Medical Association Journal earlier this yr12 was, in a sense, due to the opposing tensions of openness exemplified by Blogging platforms 2.0 and the monolithic lack of openness in old kinds of mass media like CMAJ.